Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Thoughts on Educause Australia Conference


I was going to try and blog about all the sessions I attended at last week’s Educause conference but if I wait for when I have enough time to do that I’ll never do it. So instead I’m going to do a Leigh Blackall and shoot from the hip. And I’ll probably say a few things that people may not like. However....

Educause is principally a higher ed conference so most of the presenters are from the university sector. And it just has to be said. Many of the presentations were appalling. I have never seen so many ppt slides stacked with bullet points which were read to us. I couldn’t believe it the first time, and it kept happening over the 3 days. They were classic examples of what not to do and this is what has given ppt a very bad name. Where have these people been?

The worst offender was a keynote speaker from Microsoft. His presentation was salvaged somewhat when he finally got to the interesting stuff in the last 15 minutes about lifestreams. He and colleagues have calculated that we live a 4 terrabyte life! That is, if we documented everything we ever saw, said, photographed, and filmed each life would accumulate approx 4 terrabyte of data.

And while on the subject of keynotes – it is clear that the organising committee paid no mind to presentations skills when they were selecting their keynote speakers. I’m sorry, but from keynote speakers I expect some semblance of presentation skill, but some had had little or none. And DELL and VM Ware could only have got a keynote slot because they paid a bunch of money for it. They should not have been a keynote event.

There were good keynotes though – Prof Peter Reimann from the University of Sydney spoke about improving students' ability to collaborate effectively. They have developed a wonderful tool that visualizes a student’s participation in a wiki, and I’m sure would also motivate a student to participate more. (Don’t think it’s commercially available.) Leo Plugge from Holland was also engaging, and inspired envy from Australian delegates as he talked of the national initiatives in Holland to provide superfast broadband to all educational sectors. See SURF. Mr Moodle (Martin Dougiamas) gave us a glimpse into the world of Moodle 2.0 and I like what I saw. It is clearly more porous to the outside world, and among other things allows for embedding media from external sites in discussion posts. So finally we may be able to see the discussion form freed from the tyranny of written text. There is a great opportunity for the VET [Vocational Education and Training] sector here – where many students are not great readers/writers but may be quite proficient in creating social media for discussion and assessment. (Or am I dreaming?) Michelle Seliger from Cisco was great too – delivered a strong message on Innovation, Collaboration and Partnership. (Though I did arrogantly think that she was basically delivering the same ideas in keynotes I have given in China and India over the last 2 years.)

Re concurrent sessions, apart from the 'read the ppt dot point bores', Rob Phillips from Murdoch University gave an engaging session where he sadly delivered the message that the use of technology had not yet transformed the nature of teaching and learning. (Should it? Will it?) This message was echoed by Martin D – he says that 90% of Moodle courses around the world consist of nothing more than static content and the occasional token nod to a broadcast style forum (i.e. non-interactive). Garry Allan from RMIT also gave a great session on eportfolios (they are FIRMLY on the agenda – a total of 5 sessions on this topic at the conference) where he talked about the Uni of South Australia and RMIT eport partnership. He asked whether asking students to conform to a one size fits all epf was sustainable in a world where tools are changing so quickly and students are likely to have artefacts spread all over the web in various blogs, wiki, social networking suites, etc. (Frankly I don’t think it is but I like the development of tools like Mahara, and can see them being really useful for many students when it is fully integrated into Moodle 2.0)

There were some other good concurrent sessions too, but these are the ones that stand out without having to go back and check my notes. And if I wrote about all of them I’ll never finish this. Pru Mitchell from ed.au was good on Sustaining Social Networks (“Web 1.0 was organised around pages; web 2.0 is organised around people.”) Peter Tregloan (Uni of Melbourne) was refreshingly honest about their Chemistry Flickr project – staff were positive about the project but many students did not think using Flickr was particularly relevant or useful. Kathleen Bacer (Azusa Pacific Uni) gave an energetic presentation on using Visual and Auditory Tools to Engage 21st C Learners, and urged us all to “break the online silence”.

TWITTER

Twitter is almost as common as the daily paper these days and there was a coterie of around 20 'tweeters' communicating on the back channels. Personally it really added to my enjoyment and appreciation of the conference and issues raised, but there was a strange moment during one presentation where comments on the Twitter stream started to get a little critical. Not long after there seemed to be a collective realisation that this was a little weird (unethical?) to use the backchannel to knock someone up there talking to you who has no idea that it's going on and the critism petered out. But it begs the question - is this legit behaviour for people using Twitter and other live blogging tools like Cover It Live? In this day of the backchannel should speakers realise that it is a possibility and maybe have an 'ombudsman' in the audience to keep them in the loop?

Overall I’m glad I went. It crystallised a lot of ideas for me about where VET stands in relation to other sectors, and their use of web-based technologies. So much so that I scrawled 3 pages of notes on the plane on the way home about a keynote that needs to be given called VET and the NET. :)

6 comments:

theother66 (formally MadMiller) said...

Thank you for sharing this Michael - I'm very surprised this wasn't an audio recording :). It was very interesting esp your new 'lifestream' page - how did you set that up?

Re Twitter and backchannelling - I think people forgot that a range of people view their tweets, even if they are directed the tweet to a particular individual ie @mikecogh.

I know I was reminded of appropriate Twitter behaviour a while back by a friend when I ask how they were feeling before a big presentation and their response what 'nervous, thinking about whether people like you will be bagging me on Twitter'.

Twitter was once a niche space, known by only a few geeks. However, with so many people in Twitter and with the ability to have our tweets fed into other spaces like Facebook and Friend Feed etc, we really need to remember a simple rule (which applies to all online spaces) - if you won't say what your tweeting to the person's face - because it would offend them - then DON'T write it - whether they'd ever find out you had written it or not??

I'm really looking forward to your VET and the Net presentation.

kimbowa said...

Thanks Mike,

Nice to catch up with you in person.

I tend to concur with the summary. The sessions that were best in my mind were those from people operating in the wild... and yes anything with ALTC Report remotely connected to the abstract tended to be abysmal.

I think the use of Twitter was generally very positive and affirming - and yes there was one moment where criticisms arose. But I tend to think they were reasonable criticisms - I don't recall seeing (or sending) anything that would have been considered offensive.

A speaker that sees droves of people departing his presentation should adapt... recognise what that exodus is saying and change what you're doing!

I too enjoyed the event - especially tapping into the Twitter crowd and meeting several online colleagues for the first time face-to-face.

Anonymous said...

this reminds me of something that happened a few years ago between mena trott and ben metcalf where ben was chatting on the backchannel and mena called him on it while delivering her speech.

http://dltq.org/media/menavsben.mov

personally i'm ambivalent about backchannel chat (even if it's something as alluring as twitter). i think it's often disrespectful to the presenter and others around you yet i've also gotta say that i thought mena was disgraceful in the way she chastened ben (watch the video) like a naughty little boy.

if i was to lay blame, it would be on the conference organisers who thought it was a good idea to play the back channel on the stage - does that not defeat the purpose?? to this day i have only ever seen it used in a gimmicky, pointless way so i can't say i'm a fan in any sense.

on another note i don't know why we expect university types to be better at presentations. in their world they get rewarded for skills in the field of study, not the ancillary skills like presentation or communication.

i feel a bit of a rant coming on now so i shall stop and get back to my uni homework...

adieu

roseg

Michael said...

Allison - re my 'lifestream'. I tried to set it up but lacked the skills. I had someone set it up for me. If you're interested let me know and I'll pass on the contact.

Michael said...

Rose - the backchannel in Twitter was not displayed on stage. Please feel free to rant some more :)

audrey said...

Hello good day to you!

I’ve read your blog and find it very much interesting. Can you do me a favor? Can I ask you to post my link in your blogroll/sidebar? In return with that I’ll write an article for you which are related to your blog. In this way, we both can benefit since there would probably more visitors in your blog and mine as well. It would be my pleasure if you will accept my request. Thanks in advance!

Keyword: Learn Foreign Languages
URL: http://www.abroadlanguages.com/

Best regards,
Audrey Morales